09 May 2017
Strasbourg
Reporter: Barney Dixon

SUEPO takes the Netherlands to human rights court over EPO tension


The Staff Union of the European Patent Office (SUEPO) has brought the Netherlands to the European Court of Human Rights amid rising tensions and alleged abuse at the EPO.

In a blog post on 9 May, SUEPO said that it previously sought protection from the Dutch courts in the form of an injunction to prevent the violation of EPO workers’ rights.

But the Supreme Court of the Netherlands upheld the EPO’s immunity, failing to “discharge their duty of care, thereby allowing a breach of fundamental rights on their soil and de facto condoning, if not endorsing, the EPO’s abuses”.

“When the legal system applicable to an international organisation does not provide for protection in the form of an injunction, which is essential to prevent irreparable damage, and even worse when it is virtually indisputable that the organisation is violating rights, the host state has a serious difficulty.”

“In our opinion, it has only two options: either to lift the immunity of the organisation for the benefit of a party aggrieved, or to take itself action against the rogue organisation by resorting to international arbitration.”

SUEPO said the Netherlands has done neither, and forced its hand in filing a complaint with the European Court of Human Rights.

In March, the International and European Public Services Organisation contacted German Chancellor Angela Merkel, raising its “extreme concern” with the EPO.

Senior IPSO officials said that EPO president Benoît Battistelli has conducted “massive abuses” of power, and that the EPO’s administrative council has adopted “passive attitude”, and even supported his initiatives and provided more power.

They argued that the EPO is currently experiencing “authoritarian, indeed dictatorial, attitudes”.

SUEPO held a demonstration in November last year, in solidarity with dismissed senior official Laurent Prunier, and have continued regularly.

Battistelli was criticised for attempting to change work practices at the EPO, including an end to fixed wage increases and a move to promotions by seniority rather than work performance. SUEPO resisted these changes and said it was met with severe harassment and intimidation.

Staff strikes were then banned, but SUEPO engaged regardless, leading to disciplinary proceedings against its three main representatives.

Last month, Union Syndicale Fédérale (USF) wrote to members of the European Parliament, drawing their attention to the “seriously deteriorated situation at the EPO”.

“Countless reports in the media about dismissed staff representatives, other scandals and a total loss of trust of the staff in the current EPO president, Mr Battistelli, are evidence of the seriousness of the situation at the EPO.”

The candidacy procedure for the post of president of the EPO is to be launched soon, with the position to be filled on 1 July 2018.

The EPO declined to comment.

More Europe news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Universities should be more flexible
18 August 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Perceived barriers could potentially be torn down by the Aarhus University’s proposed ‘patent free’ research zone, but academia should not be wedded to a single solution, according to Sean Jauss, partner at Mewburn Ellis
Aarhus University champions ‘patent free’ research zone
10 August 2017 | Aarhus | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Aarhus University, along with leading Danish industrial companies including Lego, has created the Open Science platform in a move away from the patenting ‘rat race’
Apple paid $1.7 billion to Nokia
31 July 2017 | Espoo | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Apple paid $1.7 billion up-front to Nokia as part of a patent settlement in May
PatSnap partners with GreyB
20 July 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Intellectual property analytics company PatSnap has entered into a strategic alliance with technology consulting and research firm GreyB
Top German court backs compulsory licence
14 July 2017 | Karlsruhe | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
A German court was right to grant a compulsory licence to a patent for a HIV drug, the country’s Federal Court of Justice has ruled
UK Supreme Court tweaks equivalent infringement
13 July 2017 | London | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The UK Supreme Court’s ruling in Actavis v Eli Lilly put more emphasis on considering the invention in the patent when assessing whether a competitor infringes, according to Hogan Lovells
The UK Supreme Court has upheld the validity of and adjudged as infringed Eli Lilly’s vitamin regimen patent for Alimta