21 March 2017
Reporter: Barney Dixon

IPSO asks Germany to step into EPO dispute

The International and European Public Services Organisation (IPSO) has penned a letter to German Chancellor Angela Merkel raising its “extreme concern” with the European Patent Office (EPO).

Senior IPSO officials alleged that EPO president Benoît Battistelli has conducted “massive abuses” of power, and that the EPO’s administrative council has at most adopted a “passive attitude”, and at times “repeatedly supported Battistelli’s initiatives by providing further powers of authority”.

In November last year, the Staff Union of the European Patent Office (SUEPO) held a demonstration in solidarity with dismissed senior official Laurent Prunier. Demonstrations have continued regularly.

The EPO also ran disciplinary actions against SUEPO’s three main representatives, reportedly against the will of the administrative council as expressed in its March 2016 resolution.

The council requested that Battistelli ensure that disciplinary proceedings are not only fair, but also seen to be so, and raised the possibility of using an external reviewer or arbitration and mediation, according to SUEPO.

Further, it requested that the EPO president notify the administrative council before further decisions in disciplinary cases are taken.

The strikes began with the president’s attempts to change work practices at the EPO.

Some of these changes included an end to fixed wage increases and promotions by seniority, rather than work performance. SUEPO resisted the proposed changes and said it was met with severe harassment and intimidation of its representatives.

Battistelli then disallowed staff strikes, which SUEPO engaged in regardless, leading to the disciplinary proceedings against its three main representatives.

Union Syndicale Brussels, one of the biggest trade unions in the European Public Service Union, joined with SUEPO and called for the EPO administrative council to “stop Battistelli’s arbitrary anti-union action”.

According to IPSO, the EPO is currently experiencing “authoritarian, indeed dictatorial, attitudes”.

In its letter, IPSO called on Germany, “as an important EU member state and host country for the EPO, at this time of direst crisis at the EPO since its creation, to take on a clear position in support and defence of the fundamental rights of the staff and their representatives”.

IPSO said that a “witch hunt” was taking place at the office. “Kafkaesque proceedings, with gross abuses of the most fundamental legal principles for the protection of staff representatives”.

It asked Merkel what measures Germany has taken, and will be taking, “to restore the rule of law, including the respecting of the rights of staff and staff representatives at the EPO”.

The EPO has yet to respond to a request for comment on the letter.

More Europe news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Universities should be more flexible
18 August 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Perceived barriers could potentially be torn down by the Aarhus University’s proposed ‘patent free’ research zone, but academia should not be wedded to a single solution, according to Sean Jauss, partner at Mewburn Ellis
Aarhus University champions ‘patent free’ research zone
10 August 2017 | Aarhus | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Aarhus University, along with leading Danish industrial companies including Lego, has created the Open Science platform in a move away from the patenting ‘rat race’
Apple paid $1.7 billion to Nokia
31 July 2017 | Espoo | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Apple paid $1.7 billion up-front to Nokia as part of a patent settlement in May
PatSnap partners with GreyB
20 July 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Intellectual property analytics company PatSnap has entered into a strategic alliance with technology consulting and research firm GreyB
Top German court backs compulsory licence
14 July 2017 | Karlsruhe | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
A German court was right to grant a compulsory licence to a patent for a HIV drug, the country’s Federal Court of Justice has ruled
UK Supreme Court tweaks equivalent infringement
13 July 2017 | London | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The UK Supreme Court’s ruling in Actavis v Eli Lilly put more emphasis on considering the invention in the patent when assessing whether a competitor infringes, according to Hogan Lovells
The UK Supreme Court has upheld the validity of and adjudged as infringed Eli Lilly’s vitamin regimen patent for Alimta