28 November 2017
Washington DC
Reporter: Barney Dixon

IPR likely to be upheld in Oil States v Greene’s Energy


Inter partes review (IPR) proceedings will likely be held as constitutional in the Oil States Energy v Greene’s Energy Supreme Court case, however there is a “significant chance” that they will be rejected, according to intellectual property lawyers.

The US Supreme Court agreed to hear the case earlier this year and decide whether inter partes review, introduced in the America Invents Act, violates the US Constitution.

Yesterday (27 November) the court heard oral arguments, revealing the potential direction of the case.

According to John Vandenberg, partner at Klarquist, while the Oil States had the “tougher day in court”, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court pick, Justice Neil Gorsuch, was “uniformly hostile” to IPR proceedings.

“[Gorsuch] urged a stronger position than [Oil States] had taken or would take, suggesting that ex parte and inter partes reexaminations are unconstitutional under article 3 because a patent is a private right. [Oil States] took the position that reexaminations are OK under article 3 because they are not adjudications,” said Vandenberg.

Marshall Schmitt, partner at Michael Best added: “Justice Gorsuch was the most active questioner possibly inclined towards finding IPRs unconstitutional, but in some instances, even his questions acknowledged the strength of arguments in favor of upholding IPRs offered by respondent and the government.”

But, Schmitt explained: “For the most part, the questioning by the panel betrayed a belief that IPR proceedings are another mechanism for the patent office to correct errors it made in the initial examination process.”

Vandenberg concluded that the most likely result would be that IPR is upheld, partly on the grounds that Oil States conceded that reexaminations, which are substantively identical to IPRs do not violate article 3.

However, Vandenberg also noted that the court might only uphold IPR for patents filed after the America Invents Act, and there remained a “significant chance” that IPRs will be rejected on the whole.

Schmitt said that, whatever the decision is, there is a “likelihood of multiple opinions to ensure that the decision does not, in the minds of certain justices, unduly expand the power of the executive branch”.

Subscribe for free to read the latest issue of IPPro Patents, which includes our panel on the potential outcomes in Oil States v Greene’s Energy.

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Patent owners winning in IPR
12 December 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Patent owners are winning more than losing in IPR proceedings, according to a study from law firm Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
High tech companies weigh in on Allergan deal
11 December 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Tech companies have argued that Allergan should not be allowed to circumvent the inter partes review process with its controversial patent deal with the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
BlackBerry to pay $137 million to Nokia
08 December 2017 | Waterloo | Reporter: Barney Dixon
BlackBerry will pay $137 million to Nokia after the International Chamber of Commerce’s International Court of Arbitration ruled against the company in a patent licensing dispute
ILO ruling “vote of no confidence” for Battistelli, says CSC
07 December 2017 | Munich | Reporter: Barney Dixon
In an open letter to the EPO’s heads of delegations, the CSC said that it interpreted the ILO’s decision as a “massive vote of no confidence in the president of the EPO"
China world’s top patent filer in 2016
07 December 2017 | Geneva | Reporter: Barney Dixon
China has emerged as the top patent filer in the world, accounting for nearly all of the 8 percent growth in patent applications in 2016
EPO president’s impartiality questioned at ILO
06 December 2017 | Geneva | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The International Labour Organisation has questioned the impartiality of EPO president Benoît Battistelli, in two tribunal decisions concerning an EPO employee, and found that there was a conflict of interest on the part of the president
Squire Patton Boggs hires ex Walgreens Boots Alliance counsel
06 December 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Squire Patton Boggs has appointed Kerry Lee as partner in its intellectual property and technology practice