08 November 2017
Brussels
Reporter: Barney Dixon

IP Europe and ACT clash over ‘licence to all’ SEP system


IP Europe has claimed that, if implemented, a ‘licence to all’ system for standard essential patents (SEPs) in Europe could be a “licence to kill” for innovation in Europe.

The research and development organisation, whose corporate members include Airbus, Ericsson, Nokia and Orange, claimed that the EU Commission’s current draft on SEPs, if adopted, would “harm European inventors and threaten Europe’s position as a leader on the technology behind 5G and the internet of things”.

The commission released a roadmap for SEPs in Europe in April, and opened a feedback period in which it accepted views from interested parties. The feedback period closed on 8 May.

In a blog post, IP Europe said that a ‘licence to all’ policy is a “new, untested, licensing policy that would significantly harm the European innovation sector and could precipitate a decline in overall European research and development of 8 percent”.

It explained: “‘Licence to all’ is inefficient, it exponentially multiplies required licence negotiations and legal fees, delays and reduces access to the latest connectivity standards to consumers, and introduces questions about compatibility with the existing legal framework.”

Francisco Mingorance, executive secretary of IP Europe, commented: “It seems extraordinary that the commission would harm European innovators by imposing untested and damaging licensing requirements based on false assertions and partial information.”

He added: “If a company market abuse exists, European competition authorities already have the tools at their disposal to sanction the culprits and there is no need to propose untested policy changes that ultimately benefit non-European companies at the expense of Europe’s innovators.”

In it’s own blog post, the App Association (ACT) replied to IP Europe’s contentions, claiming that IP Europe gave “its favourite false narrative a new coat of paint by suggesting that the bedrock fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) requirement of ‘licence for all’ equates to some kind of ‘licence to kill’.”

It said: “It’s a clever turn of phrase designed to appeal to European Commission officials debating the final shape of a communication on the licensing of standard essential patents.”

ACT said that IP Europe’s “continued marketing of this fiction” prompted a response from Karl Heinz Rosenbrock, ex-director general of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI).

In an article earlier this year, Rosenbrock explained: “ETSI adopted the clear and unambiguous policy of requiring that FRAND licences be offered to all interested comers/potential licensees who provide products or services designed to be compatible with the chosen standard, irrespective of their position in the industry or a chain of distribution.”

This isn’t the first time IP Europe and ACT have clashed over SEPs in Europe.

IP Europe recently proposed an industry code of conduct on licensing SEPs for 5G and the internet of things at a European Committee for Standardisation and Electrotechnical Standardisation workshop in Paris.

The group produced a draft project plan for a code of conduct, which will establish best practice SEP licensing arrangements for the internet of things marketplace.

But, ACT said that the workshop was intended to provide a forum for a “narrow group of companies with business models based on the licensing of SEPs” and didn’t represent a majority opinion.

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Countries should break IP rules to ensure growth, says report
23 February 2018 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Countries such as India and China should break harmonised intellectual property rules to avoid protectionist measures from the US and EU, according to a new report from Gowling WLG
EPO employment proposal halted
22 February 2018 | Munich | Reporter: Barney Dixon
A proposal to scrap permanent employment contracts at the EPO has been halted and a controversial article within it withdrawn, a source close to the Staff Union of the EPO has confirmed
UPC complaint to be heard in 2018
22 February 2018 | Karlsruhe | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The German Federal Constitutional Court will hear the constitutional complaint against the UPC in 2018
Cabinet Plasseraud promotes four to partner
21 February 2018 | Paris | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Cabinet Plasseraud has appointed for intellectual property attorneys to partner
NPE litigation in Europe sees continued growth
20 February 2018 | Brussels | Reporter: Barney Dixon
NPE litigation and enforcement in Europe has increased by an average almost 20 percent year-on-year since 2007, according to a new report from Darts-IP
BakerHostetler hires IP partner
19 February 2018 | Los Angeles | Reporter: Barney Dixon
BakerHostetler has hired Troy Schmelzer as partner in its intellectual property group
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton promotes four to partner
16 February 2018 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton has promoted four intellectual property attorneys to partner across its Shanghai, San Diego and San Francisco offices