20 September 2017
Chicago
Reporter: Barney Dixon

IP Awareness Summit to be held in November


The Centre for Intellectual Property Understanding (CIPU) and the Chicago-Kent College of Law will hold the first Intellectual Property Awareness Summit in Chicago on 6 November.

The event will be the first conference to dissect what CIPU calls “widespread confusion over the purpose and use of IP rights, like patents and copyrights”.

It will look to increase IP recognition, improve education and reduce theft.

Bruce Berman, CIPU chairman, said: “Disdain for IP rights is growing among both individuals and businesses.”

“Contrary to the headlines, not all IP rights are impediments or all licensers ‘trolls’. Uncertainty about what patents and other IP rights achieve, and for whom, has led to confusion about their purpose and value. [The summit] will seek to identify ways to bridge the IP information gap.”

Sessions at the summit will try to identify what audiences need to know about IP rights and how best to convey this information.

Manny Schecter, chief patent counsel at IBM, said: “The Intellectual Property Awareness Summit will bring together people from throughout the IP community to brainstorm about what can be done to improve IP awareness.”

“The participants will help identify concrete action items that CIPU can implement, working with other organisations in the US and abroad,” he continued.

Brian Hinman, chief IP officer at Philips, said: “The Intellectual Property Awareness Summit is the perfect opportunity for attendees to gain an appreciation of the role of all forms of IP in cutting edge innovation, and how IP captures novel ideas and creative thinking.”

Marshall Phelps, vice president of IP business and strategy at Microsoft, added: “The IP Awareness Summit is the first time the IP community, including government, IP holders, inventors, recording artists, academics and associations, have been brought together to examine the ‘disconnect’ between why IP rights exist how and how they are seen.”

“Free-riding is a growing menace that comes in many shapes and sizes, and audiences need to understand that it is theft and impacts jobs and competition.”

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Patent perception must shift, says Schecter
13 December 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Public perception must shift if the US is to find feasible solutions to patent abuse, according to chief patent counsel at IBM Manny Schecter
Patent owners winning in IPR
12 December 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Patent owners are winning more than losing in IPR proceedings, according to a study from law firm Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
High tech companies weigh in on Allergan deal
11 December 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Tech companies have argued that Allergan should not be allowed to circumvent the inter partes review process with its controversial patent deal with the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
BlackBerry to pay $137 million to Nokia
08 December 2017 | Waterloo | Reporter: Barney Dixon
BlackBerry will pay $137 million to Nokia after the International Chamber of Commerce’s International Court of Arbitration ruled against the company in a patent licensing dispute
ILO ruling “vote of no confidence” for Battistelli, says CSC
07 December 2017 | Munich | Reporter: Barney Dixon
In an open letter to the EPO’s heads of delegations, the CSC said that it interpreted the ILO’s decision as a “massive vote of no confidence in the president of the EPO"
China world’s top patent filer in 2016
07 December 2017 | Geneva | Reporter: Barney Dixon
China has emerged as the top patent filer in the world, accounting for nearly all of the 8 percent growth in patent applications in 2016
EPO president’s impartiality questioned at ILO
06 December 2017 | Geneva | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The International Labour Organisation has questioned the impartiality of EPO president Benoît Battistelli, in two tribunal decisions concerning an EPO employee, and found that there was a conflict of interest on the part of the president