26 July 2017
Washington DC
Reporter: Barney Dixon

Qualcomm accuses critics of ‘misdirection’

Third-party opinions on Qualcomm’s call for an International Trade Commission (ITC) investigation into iPhones are the result of a “coordinated effort” aimed at misdirection, the semiconductor company has claimed.

Qualcomm responded to third-party opinions from the likes of the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), whose members want the ITC to reject the request for an investigation into Apple’s alleged infringement of six patents, earlier this week (24 July).

The submissions attempt to “distract the commission from the statutory factors by improperly focusing, under the guise of public interest, on claims against Qualcomm currently pending in district court … the commission's role, however, is not to adjudicate these other claims in parallel, but to determine whether there is a violation of Section 337”.

It added: “This case was not filed to stifle competition—it was filed to halt Apple’s unauthorised use of Qualcomm technology and to prevent infringement of Qualcomm’s patents through unfairly traded imports—the very purpose of the patent laws and section 337.”

Semiconductor rival Intel, which has also filed a third-party opinion, the CCIA and Apple are “hypocritical” for disputing the legitimacy of Qualcomm’s Section 337 violation claim.

“Both Apple and Intel have filed numerous section 337 investigations, as have at least five CCIA members.”

Apple was entitled to use Qualcomm’s technology through a licence agreement between the two companies, but earlier this year Apple forced contract manufacturers to stop paying royalties on the iPhone and then filed lawsuits against the semiconductor in China and the US.

Apple built its business “in large part by utilising Qualcomm’s technology” and for “nearly a decade, Apple recognised the significant value brought by that technology and reimbursed its contract manufacturers for the license fees due for the iPhones”.

The iPhone maker filed suit against Qualcomm after the US Federal Trade Commission accused the semiconductor company of several standard-essential patent abuses.

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
USPTO unveils new filing system
15 December 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has unveiled a new filing system that will launch in 2018 and be fully implemented by 2019
Innovation has thrived under AIA, according to tech association
14 December 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The High Tech Investors Alliance has responded to contentions that recent legislation and US Supreme Court decisions, including the Alice Corp v CLS Bank case, have weakened the US patent system
Patent perception must shift, says Schecter
13 December 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Public perception must shift if the US is to find feasible solutions to patent abuse, according to chief patent counsel at IBM Manny Schecter
Patent owners winning in IPR
12 December 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Patent owners are winning more than losing in IPR proceedings, according to a study from law firm Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
High tech companies weigh in on Allergan deal
11 December 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Tech companies have argued that Allergan should not be allowed to circumvent the inter partes review process with its controversial patent deal with the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
BlackBerry to pay $137 million to Nokia
08 December 2017 | Waterloo | Reporter: Barney Dixon
BlackBerry will pay $137 million to Nokia after the International Chamber of Commerce’s International Court of Arbitration ruled against the company in a patent licensing dispute
ILO ruling “vote of no confidence” for Battistelli, says CSC
07 December 2017 | Munich | Reporter: Barney Dixon
In an open letter to the EPO’s heads of delegations, the CSC said that it interpreted the ILO’s decision as a “massive vote of no confidence in the president of the EPO"