31 May 2017
Washington DC
Reporter: Barney Dixon

SCOTUS limits patent exhaustion


The US Supreme Court has unequivocally limited patent rights in the highly anticipated litigation between Impression Products and Lexmark International.

Chief Justice John Roberts, delivering the unanimous opinion of the court, said that when a patent owner sells one of its patented products, it can “no longer control that item through the patent laws—its patent rights are said to ‘exhaust’”.

Last year, Lexmark accused Impression of patent infringement at the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio after Impression sold refilled Lexmark printer cartridges, which were modified abroad, in the US.

Impression filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that Lexmark had “exhausted its US patent rights” by its initial sales.

Supreme Court justices agreed with Impression, ruling: “The purchaser and all subsequent owners are free to use or resell the product just like any other item of personal property, without fear of an infringement lawsuit.”

In the decision, the Supreme Court overturned an en banc decision from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that sided with Lexmark.

Stroock IP partner Pierre Yanney called the ruling “brutally clear in its holding”.

“Once a patentee sells or authorises a sale of a product—that’s it, the patentee cannot recover for infringement based on that product, even if the patentee imposes restrictions, even if the patentee expressly reserves the right to sue for infringement. Instead, the Supreme Court today says what that leaves for the patentee is a 'contract' claim against the purchaser, not a claim for infringement.”

But he added: “Is this a distinction without a difference? Will infringement actions in such 'downstream customer' cases simply turn into contract actions? It seems the Supreme Court has plugged up one hole, but created another one.”

Ron Abramson, partner at law firm Lewis Baach, said the decision represents “a complete and harsh slap down for the Federal Circuit, at long-last rejecting the Federal Circuit’s long questioned 1992 decision in Mallinckrodt v Medipart, which held that a contractual reservation of rights could overcome the rule of exhaustion by prior sale that applies to the patent property right.”

He added: “I am a bit surprised to see that the court also went eight to nothing for ‘full monte’ exhaustion—upholding not only domestic patent exhaustion as widely expected, but applying the same rule to foreign sales as well, despite the fact that foreign patents under which the latter sales occurred are entirely separate from any corresponding US patents.”

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg did issue a partial dissent. While she agreed with the rest of the court on domestic exhaustion, a foreign sale “does not exhaust a US inventor’s US patent rights”.

“Patent law is territorial. When an inventor receives a US patent, that patent provides no protection abroad,” Justice Ginsburg wrote in her partial dissent.

“Because a sale abroad operates independently of the US patent system, it makes little sense to say that such a sale exhausts an inventor’s US patent rights.”

Commenting on Justice Ginsburg’s dissent, Yanney said: “The support for today’s decision appears to be an effort to harmonise copyright rights and patent rights, however, as Justice Ginsburg’s dissent reminds us, the Copyright Act is quite different from the Patent Act—something that seems to have been glossed over in the majority opinion.”

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
EPO releases UPC guidelines
23 August 2017 | Munich | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The European Patent Office’s new guide on securing unitary patent protection has arrived
ITC investigates Caterpillar
23 August 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The US International Trade Commission will investigate machinery company Caterpillar following a complaint from the Wirtgen Group
Nvidia loses subject matter challenge
22 August 2017 | Delaware | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Visual Memory’s patent for computer memory technology, asserted in its case against Nvidia, does cover eligible subject matter, according to a reversal from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
BakerHostetler hires partner trio
22 August 2017 | Chicago | Reporter: Barney Dixon
BakerHostetler has has hired three patent partners to bolster its Chicago office
US formally institutes China IP investigation
21 August 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
A Section 301 investigation into intellectual property malpractice in China championed by US President Donald Trump has formally launched
CIPU enters education partnership
21 August 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The Center for Intellectual Property Understanding and the Michelson 20MM Foundation are partnering to improve awareness of intellectual property rights
Universities should be more flexible
18 August 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Perceived barriers could potentially be torn down by the Aarhus University’s proposed ‘patent free’ research zone, but academia should not be wedded to a single solution, according to Sean Jauss, partner at Mewburn Ellis