19 May 2017
Virginia
Reporter: Barney Dixon
AIPLA supports patent reform
The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) has come out in favour of amending Section 101 of the US Patent Act.

In a report released on 12 May, AIPLA said that recent US Supreme Court decisions surrounding the law have “created significant uncertainty about what is eligible for patenting in the US”.

“AIPLA has concluded that legislation is needed to ensure the application of clear, unmalleable rules of patent eligibility with very limited statutory exceptions to provide the needed certainty in the law that is essential for encouraging investment in America’s innovation economy.”

AIPLA said that the federal circuit, district courts and the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) are struggling to find a “principled formula” to guide their decision-making.

This uncertainty has “weakened the US patent system and discouraged investments ... the EU and China are granting patents on the exact same inventions and discoveries”.

“As a result, innovators are being ‘driven overseas to create and commercialise nee technologies’ where the scope of patent protection is more certain.”

In a recent interview, AIPLA president Mark Whitaker said: “One week we’ll see a decision going one way, and then the next week a decision will go the other.”

Whitaker added that the courts and the involved parties are making up judicial exceptions.

“There is a lack of direction and it’s up to Congress to bring us reconciliation. The Alice decision moved away from a body of case law that had been developed.”

Last month, the American Bar Association called for patent reform, saying that it would support an amendment to Section 101.

In its letter, addressed to Michelle Lee, director of the USPTO, it said the amendment should “clarify that useful inventions as defined by each and every limitation of the claims of a patent satisfy the patent eligibility requirements of Section 101 so long as the claims do not preempt the use by others of all practical applications of laws of nature, natural phenomena or abstract idea".

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
EFF pushes against ‘stronger’ patents
25 May 2017 | San Fransisco | Reporter: Barney Dixon
In a blog post, Vera Ranieri, staff attorney at the EFF, said that harsher laws could actually end up harming the innovation economy
Nokia and Apple settle new dispute
24 May 2017 | California | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The settlement puts a stop to litigation that spanned the US and Germany and saw Apple claim in federal court that the Finnish company conspired with patent licensing companies to unlawfully extract royalties
Morrison & Foerster adds six litigators
24 May 2017 | San Francisco | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Morrison & Foerster has recruited a team of six intellectual property litigators from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.
Lawyers react to TC Heartland v Kraft Foods
23 May 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The US Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in favour of TC Heartland to put severe restrictions on where patent owners can bring infringement litigation has reset the clock to 1987
US Supreme Court limits forum shopping
22 May 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Supreme Court justices have ruled that venue should be limited to the judicial district where the defendant resides
IBM partners with Anaqua
22 May 2017 | Boston | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Anaqua has landed a major coup in the form of record US patent filer IBM
AIPLA supports patent reform
19 May 2017 | Virginia | Reporter: Barney Dixon
AIPLA said legislation is needed to ensure “unmalleable rules of patent eligibility”