04 May 2017
London
Reporter: Barney Dixon
UK IP Unjustified Threats Bill receives royal assent
The UK’s Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Bill, which aims to make it easier to resolve intellectual property disputes, has received royal assent.

The bill still requires secondary legislation before it can become law, but is expected to be passed later this year.

Current law in the UK places restrictions on what can be said out of court in order to settle disputes, with the possibility of an IP owner facing damages for “unjustified threats”.

Professional advisers involved in the case, acting on behalf of a client, could also be liable.

The new law will clarify what cannot be said in pre-action correspondence and protect professional advisers from legal action.

Specifically, the bill will introduce consistency in what can be said between the threats provision for patents, trademarks and designs, as well as distinguish legitimate threats from those used to damage a commercial rival.

The bill will also alter the law so that the protection against unjustified threats can apply to European patents that come under the jurisdiction of the highly-anticipated Unified Patent Court.

The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) was involved with the legislation, submitting written consultation responses and evidence to the House of Lords.

Vicki Salmon, chair of CIPA’s litigation committee, said: “I am pleased that the government has succeeded in passing this bill.”

“I would also like to acknowledge the hard work done by the Law Commission in preparing the bill and the scrutiny which the bill received in the House of Lords.”

She added: “We also welcome the exemption now given to IP legal advisers when acting on their client’s instructions.”

“The previous regime militated against seeking pre-action settlement of IP disputes, as the recipient could use the threat of suing the lawyer for an unjustified threat as a means of separating the IP right holder from his chosen legal adviser.”

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
EFF pushes against ‘stronger’ patents
25 May 2017 | San Fransisco | Reporter: Barney Dixon
In a blog post, Vera Ranieri, staff attorney at the EFF, said that harsher laws could actually end up harming the innovation economy
Nokia and Apple settle new dispute
24 May 2017 | California | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The settlement puts a stop to litigation that spanned the US and Germany and saw Apple claim in federal court that the Finnish company conspired with patent licensing companies to unlawfully extract royalties
Morrison & Foerster adds six litigators
24 May 2017 | San Francisco | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Morrison & Foerster has recruited a team of six intellectual property litigators from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.
Lawyers react to TC Heartland v Kraft Foods
23 May 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The US Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in favour of TC Heartland to put severe restrictions on where patent owners can bring infringement litigation has reset the clock to 1987
US Supreme Court limits forum shopping
22 May 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Supreme Court justices have ruled that venue should be limited to the judicial district where the defendant resides
IBM partners with Anaqua
22 May 2017 | Boston | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Anaqua has landed a major coup in the form of record US patent filer IBM
AIPLA supports patent reform
19 May 2017 | Virginia | Reporter: Barney Dixon
AIPLA said legislation is needed to ensure “unmalleable rules of patent eligibility”