02 May 2017
Washington DC
Reporter: Barney Dixon
Federal Circuit defines AIA on-sale bar provision
The America Invents Act’s (AIA) on-sale bar provision renders a patent invalid if the invention is sold before the filing date, according to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Helsinn Healthcare brought the case against Teva Pharmaceuticals, alleging the infringement of four patents relating to medication for reducing nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy.

Teva responded on the grounds that the patents were invalid under the on-sale bar provision of the AIA.

The US District Court for the District of New Jersey disagreed with this argument in its decision.

But on appeal, the Federal Circuit reversed this ruling, stating that the claims of the patents were “subject to an invalidation contract for sale prior to the critical date of 30 January 2002”, and that the “AIA did not change the statutory meaning of ‘on sale’ in the circumstances involved here”.

“The asserted claims were also ready for patenting prior to the critical date.”

If over a year before a patent’s filing date, a sales offer still acts as a bar to a patent, even if the sale is not public.

Matthew Siegal, partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, said: “While the decision is correct, it omits a discussion of the reasoning behind the on-sale bar, so as to ascertain the spirit of the law.”

“Patentees are precluded from extending the term of their patent. If they can begin soliciting offers for the patented goods more than a year before the filing date, they can artificially extend their 20 year.”

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
EFF pushes against ‘stronger’ patents
25 May 2017 | San Fransisco | Reporter: Barney Dixon
In a blog post, Vera Ranieri, staff attorney at the EFF, said that harsher laws could actually end up harming the innovation economy
Nokia and Apple settle new dispute
24 May 2017 | California | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The settlement puts a stop to litigation that spanned the US and Germany and saw Apple claim in federal court that the Finnish company conspired with patent licensing companies to unlawfully extract royalties
Morrison & Foerster adds six litigators
24 May 2017 | San Francisco | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Morrison & Foerster has recruited a team of six intellectual property litigators from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.
Lawyers react to TC Heartland v Kraft Foods
23 May 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The US Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in favour of TC Heartland to put severe restrictions on where patent owners can bring infringement litigation has reset the clock to 1987
US Supreme Court limits forum shopping
22 May 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Supreme Court justices have ruled that venue should be limited to the judicial district where the defendant resides
IBM partners with Anaqua
22 May 2017 | Boston | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Anaqua has landed a major coup in the form of record US patent filer IBM
AIPLA supports patent reform
19 May 2017 | Virginia | Reporter: Barney Dixon
AIPLA said legislation is needed to ensure “unmalleable rules of patent eligibility”