28 April 2017
London
Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Brunel University London scientists develop prior art checker
Researchers at Brunel University London have developed a new computer tool that could help designers to avoid potential clashes with patented technology.

Brunel researchers identified a need for a tool linking computer-aided design systems to prior art, and with funding from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council are developing a new system to identify potential common features between designs.

The team, made up of Drs Mark Atherton, Alessio Malizia, Pingfei Jiang and Manal Helal, as well as Professor David Harrison, have been working on patents in mechanical engineering, where the novel inventive step often relies heavily on how functions and key geometrical features of the design interact.

Brunel cited the example of aluminium beverage cans, which demonstrate relationships between function and novel geometry, as potential beneficiary of the concept.

The tool, which currently has the working title of the Design Assistant for Semantic Comparison of Intellectual Property (DASCIP), could prevent costly litigation by alerting designers at an early stage, in real-time, when aspects of their designs are too similar to patented subject matter.

DASCIP employs existing patent images annotated with descriptions in a way that allows for matches of geometric features and functional interactions to be identified. While this annotation in a new standardised vocabulary has been initially completed manually by the Brunel team during the feasibility phase, they are now developing an automatic system of annotation.

The research is now at a stage where dissemination to industry is hoped to lead to collaborative projects on real mechanical products that will demonstrate its benefits to innovation and to avoid patent issues, according to Brunel.

“Patent applications have grown nine percent worldwide year-on-year for the past two years, increasing the likelihood that a designer will unwittingly infringe on prior art,” explained Atherton.

“And with around a quarter of companies experiencing an intellectual property dispute over the past five years, and significant damages agreed in around 30 percent of cases—with average payouts of £120,000—the need for designers to be better aware of prior art is clearly increasingly important.”

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
EFF pushes against ‘stronger’ patents
25 May 2017 | San Fransisco | Reporter: Barney Dixon
In a blog post, Vera Ranieri, staff attorney at the EFF, said that harsher laws could actually end up harming the innovation economy
Nokia and Apple settle new dispute
24 May 2017 | California | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The settlement puts a stop to litigation that spanned the US and Germany and saw Apple claim in federal court that the Finnish company conspired with patent licensing companies to unlawfully extract royalties
Morrison & Foerster adds six litigators
24 May 2017 | San Francisco | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Morrison & Foerster has recruited a team of six intellectual property litigators from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.
Lawyers react to TC Heartland v Kraft Foods
23 May 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The US Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in favour of TC Heartland to put severe restrictions on where patent owners can bring infringement litigation has reset the clock to 1987
US Supreme Court limits forum shopping
22 May 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Supreme Court justices have ruled that venue should be limited to the judicial district where the defendant resides
IBM partners with Anaqua
22 May 2017 | Boston | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Anaqua has landed a major coup in the form of record US patent filer IBM
AIPLA supports patent reform
19 May 2017 | Virginia | Reporter: Barney Dixon
AIPLA said legislation is needed to ensure “unmalleable rules of patent eligibility”