11 April 2017
California
Reporter: Barney Dixon

Qualcomm comes out fighting


Qualcomm has filed counterclaims in response to Apple’s $1 billion patent lawsuit, accusing the smartphone company of abusing its power.

Apple sued Qualcomm in January for nearly $1 billion following a US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lawsuit against the semiconductor company over the licensing of standard-essential patents.

The iPhone maker claimed Qualcomm “unfairly insisted on charging royalties for technologies they have nothing to do with” and withheld nearly $1 billion in payments from Apple in retaliation for “responding truthfully to law enforcement agencies investigating them”.

Apple also hit Qualcomm in China, alleging a violation of the country’s anti-monopoly law.

In Qualcomm’s 10 April response to the lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of California, Qualcomm counterclaimed against Apple for damages and an injunction for what Qualcomm said is a “breach of contract”.

The semiconductor company accused Apple of leveraging its power to pay less than the fair market value for access to Qualcomm’s standard-essential patents.

Qualcomm denied “each and every claim stated”, arguing that Apple “fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted”.

Responding in January to Apple’s lawsuit, Qualcomm executive vice president and general counsel Don Rosenberg said: “Apple has intentionally mischaracterised our agreements and negotiations, as well as the enormity and value of the technology we have invented, contributed and shared with all mobile device makers through our licensing programme.”

He added: “We welcome the opportunity to have these meritless claims heard in court where we will be entitled to full discovery of Apple’s practices and a robust examination of the merits.”

The FTC lawsuit against Qualcomm, which filed in January in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, claimed the semiconductor company has engaged in “exclusionary conduct that taxes its competitors’ baseband processor sales, reduces competitors’ ability and incentive to innovate, and raises prices paid by consumers for cell phones and tablets”.

“Qualcomm withholds its baseband processors unless a customer accepts a licence to standard-essential patents on terms preferred by Qualcomm, including elevated royalties that the customer must pay when using competitors’ processors,” the FTC lawsuit alleged.

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Patent owners winning in IPR
12 December 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Patent owners are winning more than losing in IPR proceedings, according to a study from law firm Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
High tech companies weigh in on Allergan deal
11 December 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Tech companies have argued that Allergan should not be allowed to circumvent the inter partes review process with its controversial patent deal with the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
BlackBerry to pay $137 million to Nokia
08 December 2017 | Waterloo | Reporter: Barney Dixon
BlackBerry will pay $137 million to Nokia after the International Chamber of Commerce’s International Court of Arbitration ruled against the company in a patent licensing dispute
ILO ruling “vote of no confidence” for Battistelli, says CSC
07 December 2017 | Munich | Reporter: Barney Dixon
In an open letter to the EPO’s heads of delegations, the CSC said that it interpreted the ILO’s decision as a “massive vote of no confidence in the president of the EPO"
China world’s top patent filer in 2016
07 December 2017 | Geneva | Reporter: Barney Dixon
China has emerged as the top patent filer in the world, accounting for nearly all of the 8 percent growth in patent applications in 2016
EPO president’s impartiality questioned at ILO
06 December 2017 | Geneva | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The International Labour Organisation has questioned the impartiality of EPO president Benoît Battistelli, in two tribunal decisions concerning an EPO employee, and found that there was a conflict of interest on the part of the president
Squire Patton Boggs hires ex Walgreens Boots Alliance counsel
06 December 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Squire Patton Boggs has appointed Kerry Lee as partner in its intellectual property and technology practice