11 April 2017
California
Reporter: Barney Dixon
Qualcomm comes out fighting
Qualcomm has filed counterclaims in response to Apple’s $1 billion patent lawsuit, accusing the smartphone company of abusing its power.

Apple sued Qualcomm in January for nearly $1 billion following a US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lawsuit against the semiconductor company over the licensing of standard-essential patents.

The iPhone maker claimed Qualcomm “unfairly insisted on charging royalties for technologies they have nothing to do with” and withheld nearly $1 billion in payments from Apple in retaliation for “responding truthfully to law enforcement agencies investigating them”.

Apple also hit Qualcomm in China, alleging a violation of the country’s anti-monopoly law.

In Qualcomm’s 10 April response to the lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of California, Qualcomm counterclaimed against Apple for damages and an injunction for what Qualcomm said is a “breach of contract”.

The semiconductor company accused Apple of leveraging its power to pay less than the fair market value for access to Qualcomm’s standard-essential patents.

Qualcomm denied “each and every claim stated”, arguing that Apple “fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted”.

Responding in January to Apple’s lawsuit, Qualcomm executive vice president and general counsel Don Rosenberg said: “Apple has intentionally mischaracterised our agreements and negotiations, as well as the enormity and value of the technology we have invented, contributed and shared with all mobile device makers through our licensing programme.”

He added: “We welcome the opportunity to have these meritless claims heard in court where we will be entitled to full discovery of Apple’s practices and a robust examination of the merits.”

The FTC lawsuit against Qualcomm, which filed in January in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, claimed the semiconductor company has engaged in “exclusionary conduct that taxes its competitors’ baseband processor sales, reduces competitors’ ability and incentive to innovate, and raises prices paid by consumers for cell phones and tablets”.

“Qualcomm withholds its baseband processors unless a customer accepts a licence to standard-essential patents on terms preferred by Qualcomm, including elevated royalties that the customer must pay when using competitors’ processors,” the FTC lawsuit alleged.

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Nokia and Apple settle new dispute
24 May 2017 | California | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The settlement puts a stop to litigation that spanned the US and Germany and saw Apple claim in federal court that the Finnish company conspired with patent licensing companies to unlawfully extract royalties
Morrison & Foerster adds six litigators
24 May 2017 | San Francisco | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Morrison & Foerster has recruited a team of six intellectual property litigators from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.
Lawyers react to TC Heartland v Kraft Foods
23 May 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The US Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in favour of TC Heartland to put severe restrictions on where patent owners can bring infringement litigation has reset the clock to 1987
US Supreme Court limits forum shopping
22 May 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Supreme Court justices have ruled that venue should be limited to the judicial district where the defendant resides
IBM partners with Anaqua
22 May 2017 | Boston | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Anaqua has landed a major coup in the form of record US patent filer IBM
AIPLA supports patent reform
19 May 2017 | Virginia | Reporter: Barney Dixon
AIPLA said legislation is needed to ensure “unmalleable rules of patent eligibility”
Quinn Emanuel hires patent pro
18 May 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Steven Cherny will join the firm as partner in its New York office