05 April 2017
London
Reporter: Barney Dixon
Unwired Planet wins twice in one week
The UK High Court has ruled in favour of Unwired Planet in litigation against Huawei involving standard essential patents (SEPs).

Unwired Planet’s case revolved around its standard essential patents for mobile telecommunications, which it has committed to licensing under fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms.

The court ruled that if Huawei doesn’t agree to enter into a licensing agreement with Unwired for its patent portfolio, it could be enjoined from selling its mobile phones in the UK.

Gary Moss, head of EIP Legal, which represented Unwired in its UK case, said: “As well as being a significant decision, and validation for Unwired Planet’s licensing approach, this decision will be of great interest to the telecoms sector in general.”

“Until now there has been a view that even if the infringing party is successfully sued, at the end of the day they would have to pay no more than the royalty rate they would have had to pay anyway, and only for the countries in which they were sued. That gave an incentive for implementers to hold out in the hope of achieving a more favourable royalty rate.”

He added: “Today’s judgement confirms that this need not be the case, and that the English court will take a commercially sensible, ‘real-world’ approach to such issues.”

Meanwhile, in another win for Unwired Planet, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has denied Google’s petition for an en banc rehearing in its covered business method review against Unwired Planet’s patent.

Last year, the Federal Circuit vacated the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s final written to decision to invalidate Unwired Planet’s business method patent.

The court ruled that the board’s application of “incidental to” and “complementary to” from a US Patent and Trademark Office policy statement instead of the statutory definition “rendered superfluous” the limits Congress placed on the definition of a covered business method patent.

The America Invents Act describes a CBM patent as “a patent that claims a method or corresponding apparatus for performing data processing or other operations used in practice, administration, or management of a financial product or service, except that the term does not include patents for technological inventions”.

Yesterday (4 April), the Federal Circuit dismissed a rehearing as unnecessary because the en banc court is set to “revisit the scope of an analogous bar on judicial review from inter partes proceedings” in Wi-Fi One v Broadcom Corp.

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Nokia and Apple settle new dispute
24 May 2017 | California | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The settlement puts a stop to litigation that spanned the US and Germany and saw Apple claim in federal court that the Finnish company conspired with patent licensing companies to unlawfully extract royalties
Morrison & Foerster adds six litigators
24 May 2017 | San Francisco | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Morrison & Foerster has recruited a team of six intellectual property litigators from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.
Lawyers react to TC Heartland v Kraft Foods
23 May 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The US Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in favour of TC Heartland to put severe restrictions on where patent owners can bring infringement litigation has reset the clock to 1987
US Supreme Court limits forum shopping
22 May 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Supreme Court justices have ruled that venue should be limited to the judicial district where the defendant resides
IBM partners with Anaqua
22 May 2017 | Boston | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Anaqua has landed a major coup in the form of record US patent filer IBM
AIPLA supports patent reform
19 May 2017 | Virginia | Reporter: Barney Dixon
AIPLA said legislation is needed to ensure “unmalleable rules of patent eligibility”
Quinn Emanuel hires patent pro
18 May 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Steven Cherny will join the firm as partner in its New York office