09 March 2017
Geneva
Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Experts staunchly defend software patents
The quality of a software invention, rather than its mode of implementation, should be the litmus test for patent protection, according to two intellectual property consultants.

IP and innovation consultant Ania Jedrusik and former Qualcomm chief patent counsel Phil Wadsworth argued that patents are the strongest form of protection for the huge research and development expenditure associated with developing software-related inventions, in an article published in February’s edition of WIPO Magazine.

Challenging criticisms that software inventions are not costly to develop and that awarded patents are often low quality, they unpicked the alternatives, including copyright, which “only safeguards against the literal copying of the source or object code”, and trade secrets, whose very secrecy makes them inappropriate for standardised technologies that facilitate interoperability.

“While copyright and trade secrets are complementary forms of protection, they do not provide the same benefits as patents nor the same incentives to invest in the underlying innovation,” they wrote.

As to quality, Jedrusik and Wadsworth argued that “the decision to employ an invention using software or hardware is often a design choice that should be left to technical experts, not circumscribed by patent laws”.

They explained: “The quality of an invention, rather than its mode of implementation, should be the litmus test for patent protection … Relying on a distinction between software-related and non-software-related inventions to justify discriminatory treatment frustrates the purpose of patent law and could hamper technological progress.”

It should be left to examiners to decide whether an invention is worthy of patent protection, Jedrusik and Wadsworth argued.

“Patent examiners are empowered to consider whether the proposed invention represents a technical step forward. The focus should be on ensuring that examiners have the right tools to make that evaluation, not on excluding software-related inventions from patent protection.”

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Microsoft and Toyota connect over cars
23 March 2017 | Washington | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The deal will consolidate Microsoft software and Toyota hardware
IPO Pakistan and SIPO agree to MOU
23 March 2017 | Islamabad | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The deal will ensure high levels of cooperation in patent examination
SCOTUS weakens laches as a defence
22 March 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Laches cannot be invoked as a defence against a claim for damages brought within the six-year limitations period, according to a new ruling from the US Supreme Court
USITC to investigate LG
21 March 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The US International Trade Commission has instituted an investigation into four technology companies, including LG
IPSO asks Germany to step into EPO dispute
21 March 2017 | Munich | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The International and European Public Services Organisation has penned a letter to German Chancellor Angela Merkel raising its “extreme concern” with the European Patent Office
Lewis Roca Rothgerber hires of counsel
21 March 2017 | Los Angeles | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie has hired Holly Logue as of counsel in its intellectual property practice group
SCOTUS to decide patent exhaustion question
20 March 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow (21 March) in the much-anticipated Impression Products v Lexmark International litigation, as justices grapple with one of the more uncertain areas of US patent law