06 March 2017
Washington DC
Reporter: Barney Dixon

Kraft: It’s Congress’s call


US Congress should address patent venue questions rather than the judiciary, Kraft Foods has argued in its brief to the Supreme Court.

The brief, which was filed with the court on 1 March, argued that TC Heartland’s argument should be “addressed to Congress, which has been actively considering detailed proposals to change patent venue”.

TC Heartland wants the Supreme Court to rule that the patent venue statute is the sole regulation governing where infringement suits can be filed, which would bring so-called ‘forum shopping to an end in the US.

But Kraft argued that TC Heartland’s question has already been answered by a 2011 statute that it “barely acknowledges”.

“The undefined term ‘resides’ or ‘residence’ appears in venue statutes throughout the US code and the lack of a statutory definition had left courts struggling to ascertain the residence of an individual, an unincorporated business or a corporate plaintiff.”

“The definitions adopted in 2011 answered all of those questions, for all venue statutes. And Heartland no longer disputes that under the 2011 definition, it resides in Delaware, where this suit was brought.”

Kraft argued that, instead, TC Heartland contends that Congress meant to leave patent infringement cases out of the statute. “Congress meant to define ‘residence’ for all venue purposes except patent-venue purposes.”

“The text, history, and structure of the venue statutes all refute that argument.”

“Ultimately TC Heartland and its amici are just arguing that, as a policy matter, corporations should enjoy a dramatically broader venue privilege in patent-infringement cases than they enjoy in other cases.”

Kraft added: “That argument should be addressed to Congress, which has been actively considering detailed proposals to change patent venue.”

The case is set for argument in the Supreme Court on 27 March.

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Apple to pay $439 million for FaceTime infringement
18 October 2017 | Texas | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Apple must pay VirnetX $439 million for infringing VirnetX patents with its FaceTime application
Restasis patents invalidated at Texas court
17 October 2017 | Texas | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Four patents relating to Allergan’s Restasis dry eye treatment have been invalidated by a US court, despite the pharmaceutical company’s patent transfer agreement with the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
Businesses should prepare for UPC, despite uncertainty
17 October 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Businesses should make preparations for the Unified Patent Court and unitary patent, despite mounting uncertainty surrounding when, if at all, the court will come into effect
Patent ‘irrationality’ causes a negative image of patents
16 October 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Spectators are far more accepting of copyright and trademarks than they are of patents because of “irrationality”, according to Sir Robin Jacob
Partner promotions at White & Case
13 October 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
White & Case has promoted 31 new partners, including four intellectual property attorneys, across the US and UK
Qualcomm hit with $775 million fine in Taiwan
13 October 2017 | Taipei | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Qualcomm has been hit with a $775 million fine, after the Taiwan Fair Trade Commission found that the chipmaker had abused its position in the baseband chip market
SUEPO willing to work with new EPO president
12 October 2017 | Munich | Reporter: Barney Dixon
A source close to the Staff Union of the European Patent Office has revealed it is always willing to work with whoever is elected to lead the European Patent Office