06 March 2017
Washington DC
Reporter: Barney Dixon
Kraft: It’s Congress’s call
US Congress should address patent venue questions rather than the judiciary, Kraft Foods has argued in its brief to the Supreme Court.

The brief, which was filed with the court on 1 March, argued that TC Heartland’s argument should be “addressed to Congress, which has been actively considering detailed proposals to change patent venue”.

TC Heartland wants the Supreme Court to rule that the patent venue statute is the sole regulation governing where infringement suits can be filed, which would bring so-called ‘forum shopping to an end in the US.

But Kraft argued that TC Heartland’s question has already been answered by a 2011 statute that it “barely acknowledges”.

“The undefined term ‘resides’ or ‘residence’ appears in venue statutes throughout the US code and the lack of a statutory definition had left courts struggling to ascertain the residence of an individual, an unincorporated business or a corporate plaintiff.”

“The definitions adopted in 2011 answered all of those questions, for all venue statutes. And Heartland no longer disputes that under the 2011 definition, it resides in Delaware, where this suit was brought.”

Kraft argued that, instead, TC Heartland contends that Congress meant to leave patent infringement cases out of the statute. “Congress meant to define ‘residence’ for all venue purposes except patent-venue purposes.”

“The text, history, and structure of the venue statutes all refute that argument.”

“Ultimately TC Heartland and its amici are just arguing that, as a policy matter, corporations should enjoy a dramatically broader venue privilege in patent-infringement cases than they enjoy in other cases.”

Kraft added: “That argument should be addressed to Congress, which has been actively considering detailed proposals to change patent venue.”

The case is set for argument in the Supreme Court on 27 March.

More news
The latest news from IPPro Patents
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Microsoft and Toyota connect over cars
23 March 2017 | Washington | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The deal will consolidate Microsoft software and Toyota hardware
IPO Pakistan and SIPO agree to MOU
23 March 2017 | Islamabad | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The deal will ensure high levels of cooperation in patent examination
SCOTUS weakens laches as a defence
22 March 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Laches cannot be invoked as a defence against a claim for damages brought within the six-year limitations period, according to a new ruling from the US Supreme Court
USITC to investigate LG
21 March 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The US International Trade Commission has instituted an investigation into four technology companies, including LG
IPSO asks Germany to step into EPO dispute
21 March 2017 | Munich | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The International and European Public Services Organisation has penned a letter to German Chancellor Angela Merkel raising its “extreme concern” with the European Patent Office
Lewis Roca Rothgerber hires of counsel
21 March 2017 | Los Angeles | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie has hired Holly Logue as of counsel in its intellectual property practice group
SCOTUS to decide patent exhaustion question
20 March 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow (21 March) in the much-anticipated Impression Products v Lexmark International litigation, as justices grapple with one of the more uncertain areas of US patent law