Vin Caraher
Clarivate Analytics
Onex recently bought Thomson Reuter’s IP & Science business. The strategy of the rebranded Clarivate Analytics is to connect the entire IP lifecycle in a way that empowers all users, says CEO Vin Caraher

What was the onus behind Onex’s acquisition of IP & Science?

Onex and Baring Asia are a good fit for the business with a strong track record in understanding, investing and growing businesses such as Clarivate Analytics. Onex and Baring Asia are well known globally as established private equity groups, and are committed to the future of the company, supporting its customers and growing the business.
 
How will Clarivate Analytics differ from IP & Science?

It is our intention to operate Clarivate Analytics without interruption of service or quality to any customer. Our priorities include remaining fully committed to serving our customers, continuing to invest in developing better solutions and growing the business. In addition, investment priorities and plans agreed for 2016 remain in place and unchanged as part of this deal. We remain focused on achieving a strong end to the year.

We are working towards a broader launch of our branding across the company and our products and will share more details about this over the coming weeks and months.
 
How does Clarivate intend to extend and improve on the work done by Thomson Reuters?

Onex and Baring Asia have a strong track record of investing in successful businesses for many years across a variety of sectors, helping them achieve strong levels of growth. Based on current performance, we see no reason why that should not be the case with Clarivate Analytics. As we go through the transition process and disentangle from Thomson Reuters, it’s too early to speculate on future financial performance. We look forward to reporting back as the business develops.
 
Clarivate Analytics will continue to invest heavily in our flagship products, like Derwent World Patents Index, IP services and Thomson Innovation, which we re-launched in July 2016.

What sorts of challenges will patent owners face in the near future? Will they be similar or different to challenges face under Thomson Reuters?

Our customers continue to face an increasingly complex patent landscape with shifting regulatory landscape, increasing litigation costs and an increased focus on monetisation of IP by corporations. In today’s ultra-competitive marketplace, intellectual property research has become more difficult, with huge sums at stake for getting it right and sometimes even bigger potential for losses if corporations get it wrong. As these pressures grow, corporations are focusing on making the best R&D decisions further upstream.

The strategy at Clarivate Analytics is to connect the entire IP lifecycle in a way that empowers all users of IP data, management and decision making to come together and increase their organisation’s return on intangible assets. For example, with the new improvements to our Smart Search technology, intellectual property researchers can conduct thorough investigations, arriving at the most relevant results in the shortest possible time to avoid making costly mistakes.

Interviews
The latest interviews from IPPro Patents
Features
The latest features from IPPro Patents
With UC Berkeley appealing against the US PTAB’s decision in the CRISPR-Cas9 case, what’s next for the groundbreaking gene-editing technology? Kevin O’Connor, partner at Neal Gerber Eisenberg, explains
While uncertainty persists, plant breeders may need to double down to secure their rights, says Penny Maplestone of the British Society of Plant Breeders
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Least developed countries can now more easily obtain compulsory licences during public health emergencies, but some have been slow to take advantage. Vítor Palmela Fidalgo of Inventa International explains why
Diana Portna of D&L IP Group explains how Ukraine’s compulsory licensing laws could be opened up for the public interest, and how rights owners could react
Facing unacceptable pendencies in 2003, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office dug deep to make the patent prosecution service more efficient
TC Heartland’s Supreme Court question may see patent owners going cold on the Eastern District of Texas
It is incumbent on practitioners and applicants to take care in drafting and prosecuting applications, says Bea Koempel-Thomas of Lee & Hayes
Is American chipmaker Qualcomm in trouble? Joachim Frommhold of Weinmann Zimmerli examines the facts
Country profiles
The latest country profiles from IPPro Patents
Bruno Nunes of BN IP explains how patent prosecution and licensing works in Macau, a market dominated by gaming and pharma
Tran Viet Phuong of Duong Tran offers a handy guide to patent prosecution
IPPro Connects

Visit our sister site
the worlds biggest and best IP directory

ipproconnects.com
The Andean Community has stood firm in the defence of its owns interests, says Jesús Cuba and Kelly Sánchez of OMC Abogados & Consultores
The first preliminary injunction granted by a China IP court was awarded to Christian Louboutin. Dr Weili Ma of Chofn Intellectual Property explains
Patent prosecution in South Africa rarely favours the inventor, but recent reforms are aiming to change that, one little bit at a time
The Tanzania Patent Office is a useful partner in the prosecution process, says Sunday Godfrey Ndamugoba of ABC Attorneys
Dominic Ogega Mwale, managing partner at Mwale & Company, explains how to patent in Kenya
Patent owners looking for an attractive place to seek protection in Asia need look no further than Singapore, says Max Ng and Gerald Mursjid of Gateway Law Corporation